Altoros — Forward Deployed Engineering · AI-Era Delivery
Altoros
AI-Era Technology Solutions  /  Forward Deployed Engineer Model
Get in touch
The AI-Era Engagement Model

AI changed what software can do. Now it's changing how you benefit from it.

Meet the Altoros Forward Deployed Engineering (FDE) model — the new engagement built around the AI-era capabilities for solving your business problem.

See what your engagement could look like → See how it compares to T&M →

The engagement model the frontier AI labs run on — Forward Deployed Engineers are how Anthropic, OpenAI, and Palantir get deployments into production.

An engineer orchestrating AI deployment pipelines, agents, and governance across holographic interfaces
01 The classic outsource model

What you're paying for today, and what you're not getting.

Most AI initiatives are still bought the classic way: hourly time & materials, or a dedicated team you pay to ramp up and manage. It works for some kinds of work — but for getting your business problem solved with the help of AI, it has three structural problems that show up as overruns, frustration, and lost context.

Ticking off tasks, not owning the result.

A T&M team crosses out action items on your specification rather than owning the business problem. There's no result-orientation by design — you carry the risk that the finished checklist still doesn't move the outcome you actually needed.

Context lost in the handoffs.

When a team of 3–5 people is involved — BAs, PMs, architects, developers — the meaningful context gets diluted at every relay. Communication overhead grows, and the nuance of what you actually need erodes between the people who heard it and the people who build it.

Your IP leaks to the vendor.

Engineers work in the vendor's tooling, on the vendor's accounts, with prompts and context the vendor accumulates. When the engagement ends, the institutional knowledge walks out the door. You paid for the work; the vendor kept the leverage.

02 Two offers, two different needs

FDE and T&M aren't better-or-worse. They answer different questions.

Time & Materials is a legitimate product — it's the right fit when your actual need is a hiring conversion: you have the spec and you want hands under your direction. Altoros FDE is a different offer, with different qualifications, for prospects whose actual need is solving a business problem they don't yet have a spec for. Here's what each one commits to.

What you're
comparing
Legacy product
T&M / Dedicated Team
The AI-era offer
Altoros FDE
Best when your need is
A hiring conversion — you have the spec, you want hands
Solving a business problem you don't have a spec for
What you buy
Time and hands, billed as used, under your direction
A validated, working AI solution in your production environment
Pricing
Hours × rate, unbounded budget
Fixed price + outcome bonus — total in the low-tens-of-$K
Timeline
Ongoing — ramp, then deliver, for as long as you staff it
~8 weeks from discovery to working solution
Who owns the outcome
You do — you direct the work, you carry the risk
We do — the FDE owns the business problem end-to-end
Guarantee
Outcome bonus paid only when the validation gate is met
Measurement
Timesheets and burn-down
A business metric you choose — baseline vs. post-deployment
IP & accounts
Often the vendor's tooling and accounts
Your IP, prompts, and context stay yours throughout
{{ fcStepLabel }} Quick fit check

{{ fcQuestionTitle }}

{{ fcVerdict.badge }}

{{ fcVerdict.title }}

{{ fcVerdict.lead }}

{{ fcVerdict.ctaLabel }}
No email needed to see your verdict Your verdict is above
The brand promise

For when you have a business problem you believe AI can solve but can't get from idea to working solution fast enough: Altoros FDE delivers a validated, working AI solution in your production environment within ~8 weeks of discovery, at a total cost in the low-tens-of-$K, with a measurable improvement on a business metric you choose — your baseline vs. the post-deployment number.

Guarantee. The outcome bonus is paid only when the validation gate is met. If we don't move the agreed business metric within the timeline, you don't pay the outcome portion. Four dimensions are captured against a baseline taken before we build.

03 What You Get

One senior engineer. A whole team's worth of capability.

We're not selling you one person for the price of four. Your FDE is one senior engineer equipped with proper AI expertise, agentic workflows, the reusable IP library Altoros has built, and on-demand access to the Altoros talent pool — so a single accountable contact delivers team-scale output against your chosen metric.

Tap a card to see what's behind it →

{{ card.num }}

{{ card.q }}

Tap to see how →

{{ card.a }}

← Tap to flip back
04 How It Works

How an FDE engagement actually runs.

STEP 01

Discovery & Scope

A 5–10 day sprint inside your business unit. Output: a fast prototype showcasing the suggested solution — plus the success metric and the fixed price. Both sides sign off before the full build.

STEP 02

Architecture & Eval Design

The engineer owns the technical decisions: build vs. buy, model selection, RAG/agent patterns, evaluation framework. Documented and yours to keep.

STEP 03

Build & Deploy

Working code in short weekly increments, entirely inside your own accounts — every prompt and context stays in your environment from day one.

STEP 04

Validation Gate

You confirm the outcome — your baseline vs. the post-deployment number. The outcome bonus is paid only here.

Time
First real value in weeks, not months. ~8 weeks from discovery to working software.
Cost
Fixed price in the low-tens-of-$K. Outcome bonus paid only at the validation gate.
Ownership
Your accounts. Your IP. Your prompts. Your context. Yours throughout, yours after.
$3–6K/week · ~8 weeks

Fixed price for the outcome plus an outcome-based bonus, paid only when the validation gate is met. Concrete scope and price are agreed in Step 01 — no movement after kickoff unless you ask for it, in which case you get a transparent quote, never silent overruns.

05 Proven in production

Real examples of the model at work.

We've been running the FDE model with real customers for a while now — and the results speak for themselves. Here are three recent engagements. Every detail that could identify a company has been removed; the operational specifics are real.

Three manual spreadsheets consolidating into one scheduling system
Field-services business · ~50 staff

Scheduling that moves with reality.

Every job was written out three times — sales to survey to install — in spreadsheets kept in step by hand, on a plan where most dates never held. One embedded engineer owned the problem end to end: now a job is entered once and flows everywhere, the schedule bends with weather, contractors and the two-week cooling-off instead of breaking, and a live HubSpot link keeps the plan and the CRM in sync. The team got an honest answer to "when do my works start?" — and ~1 hour a week back.

2 months
~$18K fixed price, outcome-based
3 → 1
spreadsheets unified, ~75 jobs/cycle
Read the full story →
An embedded engineer connected to a cloud-native platform and a field of sensor-monitored crops
AgTech sensor platform · cloud-native team

Roadmap capacity, without hiring.

The platform team was at capacity keeping the product scaling and running, with new features stalled on the roadmap. One embedded lead engineer takes carved-out scope from description to tested, deployable code via agentic delivery — inside the team's own sprints, repos, CI and AI accounts, with architecture decisions staying under their control.

up to +40%
projected throughput vs. a multi-person team
within days
from scoped request to working code
Request the full story →
An engineer maintaining a full data-and-front-end stack with health checks across every layer
Multi-tenant data platform · full-stack ownership

One owner for a whole platform.

With a first paying client about to onboard, a built-out data platform — pipelines, models, presentation layer and front end — needed consolidated upkeep instead of an internal lead juggling outside contractors. One embedded senior engineer owns it maintenance-first, turning recurring failures into automated checks so the same flat fee buys progressively more each month.

$8K / mo
flat fee, full-stack ownership
~65 → fewer
monthly failures, automated away
Request the full story →
06 Why Altoros

A fixed price, one point of contact — and a whole team's capability behind it.

When you pay this fixed price and talk to one FDE, you're not getting one pair of hands. You're getting one senior engineer equipped with proper AI expertise, agentic workflows, the reusable IP library Altoros has built, and on-demand access to the Altoros talent pool. That team-equivalent at a single-owner price is only possible because of the new technological capabilities we've leveraged at Altoros — it's the math working differently, not a discount.

One owner, team-scale delivery.

A single accountable engineer multiplies their capacity through agentic workflows and our bench — you get the throughput of a multi-person team without hiring or managing one.

Reusable IP that compounds.

A managed skill library, code patterns, and project templates that Altoros has built mean every new engagement starts further along the curve — you don't pay to build from scratch.

25 years of production engineering.

Shipping production software for enterprise customers since 2001, and access to the wider Altoros talent pool whenever an engagement needs a specific expertise. The model is new; the discipline behind it isn't.

07 Start the conversation

Tell us your challenge.

Describe it in a few sentences — the outcome you need, what's in the way, and what you've tried. A senior engineer reads every one, and we reply within one business day.